BOT Picks Up Doxxing Info Against GREMLIN------SNIT REPLIES....Y ?

[Keppi]

Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
regarding Gremlin.
So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
pick it up?

More importantly, why does snit further the seeding by
replying to pursent when he knows that it's a BOT thread
he is replying to.

Here are the headers for both the bot Dox post and Snit's
third party reply post.

X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:e02:b0:269:34bf:7477 with SMTP
id ge2-
20020a17090b0e0200b0026934bf7477mr2762829pjb.2.16927362097
72; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!
2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!
usenet.blueworldhosting.com!
diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-
me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-
out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<LAmdneKxs9XTn3j5...@giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=2001:67c:2628:647:5:0:0:181; posting-
account=Vm0uAgoAAABvTYeieyl4GElbOkHDqJYr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:67c:2628:647:5:0:0:181
References: <qPycnSOmi__xRn_
5nZ2dnZf...@giganews.com>
<q9icnYGuI81vTXn5...@giganews.com>
<Hj4FM.119367$uEkc....@fx35.iad>
<UrycnSAzBfyFQnn5...@giganews.com> <%
c5FM.109571$zW7d...@fx43.iad>
<LAmdneKxs9XTn3j5...@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <73042ebb-dc31-448d-9e54-
1058c1...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: DID SNIT TELL YOU ABOUT
From: Snit Michael Glasser <frelw...@gmail.com> BOT



Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!
feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer01.ams4!
peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-
media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> SNIT
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: DID SNIT TELL YOU ABOUT
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
References: <qPycnSOmi__xRn_
5nZ2dnZf...@giganews.com>
<LAmdneKxs9XTn3j5...@giganews.com> <73042ebb-
dc31-448d-9e54...@googlegroups.com>
<CaOcnUBiDqPtvnj5...@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.1/l - Full License
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <l4aFM.863532$GMN3....@fx16.iad>
X-Complaints-To: ab...@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 21:50:09 UTC

[Joel]

Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
>regarding Gremlin.
>So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
>pick it up?
>
>More importantly, why does snit further the seeding by
>replying to pursent when he knows that it's a BOT thread
>he is replying to.
>
>Here are the headers for both the bot Dox post and Snit's
>third party reply post.
>

>Subject: Re: DID SNIT TELL YOU ABOUT
>From: Snit Michael Glasser <frelw...@gmail.com> BOT
>

>From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> SNIT


Looks like a simple case of self-defense. You're so obsessed with
Snit that you forget he has that kind of human right. You are a
moron.

--
Joel Crump

[pothead]

Do yourself a favor and KF snit, his bot and his nyms.
It's pretty much a given that most people believe snit is behind the bot even if he didn't code it
which is doubtful he would be able to.


--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

[%]

lemme see your bot do this

😀 😃 😄 😁 😆 😅 😂 🤣 🤩 🥳 😏 😒 😞 😔 😟 😕 🙁 ☹️ 😣 😖 😫 😩 🥺 😢
😭 😮‍💨 😤 😠 😡 🤬 🤯 😳 🥵 🥶 😱 😨 😰 😥 😓 🫣 🤗 🫡 🤔 🫢 🤭 🤫 🤥
😶 😶‍🌫️ 😐 😑 😬 🙄 😯 😦 😧 😮 😲 🥱 😴 🤤 😪 😵 😵‍💫 🫥 🤐 🥴 🤢 🤮
🤧 😷 🤒 🤕 🤑 🤠 😈 👿 👹 👺 🤡 💩 👻 💀 ☠️ 👽 👾 🤖 🎃 😺 😸 😹 😻 😼
😽 🙀 😿 😾

[Snit Michael Glasser]

But when the stats were run, it turns out beyond any doubt, Commander Kinsey
was far more "narcissistic" than anybody else. Hope Commander Kinsey likes
the silence in the teeming cesspool of my KF. Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot'
Petruzzellis.

That is the problem today and less experienced educators don't know what
they are doing; people from pre-tech generations should know better than
to fall for liberalism. When I got here, I wanted to be trusting and unaffected
by herd views. I gave Commander Kinsey more than a wise person generally
would.

--
Dustin Cook 1-423-491-1448

[%]

you get old really fast

[Gremlin]

Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com>
news:MPG.3f4f1c69d...@news.eternal-september.org Wed, 23 Aug 2023

00:27:06 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
> regarding Gremlin.
> So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
> pick it up?

Hiya Keppi is it? :)

Why the sudden interest in the bot, or myself? As for the bot doxxing me,
umm, no. It's repeating what snit already shared when he provided the cell I
gave him-along with a totally bullshit, but semi elaborate story on how he
acquired it. My giving it to him over the course of our conversation doesn't
sound anywhere near as good as my having made a technical fuckup and 'doxxed
myself'.

It's a burner cell. so... :)

> More importantly, why does snit further the seeding by
> replying to pursent when he knows that it's a BOT thread
> he is replying to.

For a newbie here, you've caught on very fast. You seem to have arrived just
in the nick of time for snit, too. He needs all the help he can get. So many
won't interact with him now, or, when they do, they're calling out some
bullshit he wrote. :)

> Here are the headers for both the bot Dox post and Snit's
> third party reply post.

We've seen them, thanks. It recycles so no doubt, you'll see it all again.
And again. And again. That's the point behind it. :)

If you aren't a snit sock, or something else along those lines, you'd be
better off filtering snit, and the, and %

Joel bullshitted you in his reply, too, btw. Snit doxxed me first. So, he
can't very well be defending himself as Joel told you. Also, consider that
Joel called you a moron (your posts to snit indicate you likely are) and all
you've done is post this and confirm snit has conned you. Oops.

--
I was told I could avoid Jail if I went to therapy.
At my first session the therapist said to me, "Imagine a train is coming
towards you, what do you do?" I said, "I get in my helicopter and fly away"
He said, "Where did you get the helicopter from?" I said, "The same fuckin
place you got that train"

[Gremlin]

Joel <joel...@gmail.com> news:vblaeipc87m9r6p4s...@4ax.com

Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:41:41 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
>>regarding Gremlin.
>>So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
>>pick it up?
>>
>>More importantly, why does snit further the seeding by
>>replying to pursent when he knows that it's a BOT thread
>>he is replying to.
>>
>>Here are the headers for both the bot Dox post and Snit's
>>third party reply post.
>>
>>Subject: Re: DID SNIT TELL YOU ABOUT
>>From: Snit Michael Glasser <frelw...@gmail.com> BOT
>>
>>From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> SNIT
>
>
> Looks like a simple case of self-defense.

Snit shared the cell number that Kepi wrote about before I doxxed him. So,
uhh, not a simple case of self defense. Quite the contrary. It was a clear
and cut case of justified response on my part.

> You're so obsessed with Snit that you forget he has that kind of human
> right.

You have things ass about face here, though. Snit fired on me first. He
doesn't have any right to do that. I do have the right to defend myself,
and that's what *I* (not snit) did.

> You are a moron.

Joel, you dumb shit, He was making friends with snit in another thread.
Snit snowed him into thinking he's a straight up good guy. Don't call him
a moron for buying it. Snits your friend, right? Don't you want him to
think your buddy is the good guy?

And do you really want to go around calling people a moron when you're on
record as claiming that microsoft marked your machine in such a way that
you were blacklisted from using windows? C'mon man. You were being a bit
moronic sharing the shite understanding you have of how the machine
sitting in front of you works.

Also, wasn't it moron level for you to order the wrong parts for it the
first go? As an actual professional level, multi cert holding comp repair
technician, I'd have to say thats a total n00b level mistake. It's moron
mistake level in your case though because you aren't a n00b. You actually
attended college (but dropped out) to learn the trade.

Watch who you call a moron next time. :) That's just two examples showing
that you are one. Three if you count the fact you have things ass about
face with regard to snit defending himself. He can't defend himself by
taking the first shot, "Moron"

FFS where do these people come from...

[Gremlin]

pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uc3ltr$2kd93$1...@dont-email.me Wed, 23

Aug 2023 01:03:55 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 2023-08-23, Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
>> regarding Gremlin.
>> So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
>> pick it up?

>

> Do yourself a favor and KF snit, his bot and his nyms.
> It's pretty much a given that most people believe snit is behind the bot
> even if he didn't code it which is doubtful he would be able to.

This poster is very 'new' here, has already 'made friends' with snit in
another thread here and has already taken an interest in me. They even put
my handle in caps for the subject line. I've never interacted with anyone
under that handle before. Do you think it's a pure coincidence that they're
singling me out (considering all the garbage the floodbot posts daily) and
thinking that snit is a straight up good guy? :) I'm uhh, not, buying it.

I'm not going to claim they're a sock of a poster here, just yet though.
I'll wait and see what else they write about. But, I am keeping my eye open.
rofl!

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Rbowman is STILL fixated on exclusively himself, as I noted, when it
comes to the business of hacking. And he completely avoids the proof
that his "friend" has not only confessed to engaging in this against
Dustin but he has said he deems it to be no big deal... inconsequential.

Can you stop pleading for my attention? Please show a single time of
a profitable company that has built its position by not caring about
its clients and merchandise. The Linux virtual drive Rbowman mentioned
is read-only media. It is not possible to write new information to it.
The herd members value the LCD in all things. In Rbowman's case, I, and
a whole list of "forgers", had pointed to things Rbowman said and did,
he ignored the evidence. What Rbowman did not deny was people complaining
about them, which is how he ended up with his list, as you know.

--
Dustin Cook 1-423-491-1448

[pothead]

On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uc3ltr$2kd93$1...@dont-email.me Wed, 23
> Aug 2023 01:03:55 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 2023-08-23, Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
>>> regarding Gremlin.
>>> So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
>>> pick it up?
>
>>
>> Do yourself a favor and KF snit, his bot and his nyms.
>> It's pretty much a given that most people believe snit is behind the bot
>> even if he didn't code it which is doubtful he would be able to.
>
> This poster is very 'new' here, has already 'made friends' with snit in
> another thread here and has already taken an interest in me. They even put
> my handle in caps for the subject line. I've never interacted with anyone
> under that handle before. Do you think it's a pure coincidence that they're
> singling me out (considering all the garbage the floodbot posts daily) and
> thinking that snit is a straight up good guy? :) I'm uhh, not, buying it.
>
> I'm not going to claim they're a sock of a poster here, just yet though.
> I'll wait and see what else they write about. But, I am keeping my eye open.
> rofl!
>

I haven't been following along, but this has the unmistakable stench of snit.
It seems when he has a hissy fit and claims he is going to ignore certain posters, somehow,
someway, new posters and long time posters from other groups, like %, start posting replies to snit.
It's no coincidence.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

What does it take to end this?

Why would you trust me if you understand there's a possibility that Glasser
Michael Snit uses socks? That literally makes sense to you? This is the
so-called improved 'rule' by those calling themselves 'elite', you must
'litmus test' yourself, you are no longer given due process, you're tossed
to the hounds until you stop posting, which is not possible in this story.
Sadly this is what arises when deeply bad self confidence takes over Glasser
Michael Snit's entire life.

Being open source as it is, usenet will never go away but it'll never
be known by the general public.


--
Dustin Cook 1-423-491-1448

[Snit Michael Glasser]

My view is that we should ALL report the flooding and then it will stop.

Wolffan writes all kinds of crap, don't use that idiot as a reference. They
imply asking for guidance for an RMS-approved application is trolling. And
you do realize that it isn't impossible for Wolffan to be doing this, or
paying one of his programmer "friends" to do it. On topic discussions will
leave once those of us here before the eternal September are outnumbered.
That, and there will invariably be a conniption fit or more in an unmoderated
usenet group. The current crap aside, we have all seen who frequently gets
angry when he doesn't get anyone on his side.

Where did Wolffan find your scripts?

Wolffan has cut down on the nonstop self obsessed, senseless attacks he
used to produce but he is really not much different in the honor dept. He
simple uses shills more to generate those threads.

-
Dustin Cook 1-423-491-1448

[Gremlin]

pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uc4rb2$2tcks$1...@dont-email.me Wed, 23
Aug 2023 11:42:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

[snip]

>> I'm not going to claim they're a sock of a poster here, just yet
>> though. I'll wait and see what else they write about. But, I am keeping
>> my eye open. rofl!
>>
>
> I haven't been following along, but this has the unmistakable stench of
> snit.

Doesn't it though. It's quite stinky.

> It seems when he has a hissy fit and claims he is going to ignore
> certain posters, somehow, someway, new posters and long time posters
> from other groups, like %, start posting replies to snit. It's no
> coincidence.

That seems to be the case, yes. I'm not sure which newsgroup the crossposts?
are affecting, but I seem to be catching a little shit over it; as If I'm
the one who initiated it or something? :( Ah well.

[Snit]

On Aug 22, 2023 at 9:48:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
<jgidnTdVH_EMEnj5...@giganews.com>:

I would love to see how the text is generated.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

I don't know if there is a no-cost FOSS program to handle such tasks.
Snit and the advocates insist searching for a recommendation for a Linux
application is instigating.
Mike Easter: <XnsACC9F3...@z9kfcl9n7KHDpF0eI.64L>
-----
Yea, I call bullshit on that. Driver media doesn't have a valid
boot sector present. As a result, the machine wouldn't have
refused to reboot because the disk was left behind.
-----

A reasoned response would be for you to just note your error -- of course
you were wrong to say "the machine would not have refused to reboot because
the disk was left behind." That is in fact exactly what was happening.

And you were wrong to say I suggested this was true of machines other
than the one being noted in Carroll's trolling.
At one point, he said an online denizen was "obsessing" over him, which
was shown to be merely responding to any name he uses.


--
Steve Carroll is a narcissistic bigot

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Only Steven Petruzzellis repeatedly shows videos scripting Google Groups.

Only Steven Petruzzellis repeatedly lied about what I say can be done
with AppleScript.

Only Steven Petruzzellis spoke of the bot changing names shortly before
it started to rapidly do so.

Only Steven Petruzzellis spoke of the bot changing how it wraps shortly
before it started doing so.

Only Steven Petruzzellis spoke of a GG plugin to block it even after
the name changes, something you later denied you could do, and as far as
has been speculated can only be done by the person running the bot.

Only Steven Petruzzellis said ALL of your "code demoes" were tied to
one or more bots.

Only Steven Petruzzellis admitted telling lies about scripting of Google
Groups.

Only Steven Petruzzellis (of those of us in this group) posted about
x10 suspending your 'net access for inappropriate bot usage.

Only Steven Petruzzellis (of those of us in this group) complained
about Comcast and their "Bot" harassment and their comments of the bot on
your Mac.

Only Steven Petruzzellis spoke of not just of how little programming
the bot *might* need, but how little it actually has. How would you know?

Only Steven Petruzzellis spoke of *posting* in response to emulating
a mouse click (do shell script "usr/local/bin/cliclick c:250,300").

Add to that you repeatedly insist the content of the bot posts serves your
stated goal perfectly of pointing away from you and toward the one you have
admitted you want to blame. How odd is that!

--
Dustin Cook's number, tied to Johnson City
<https://www.whitepages.com/phone/1-423-491-1448>

[%]

In article <uc4rb2$2tcks$1...@dont-email.me>, pot...@snakebite.com says...

shuddup

[Joel]

Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

>> You [troll poster] are a moron.

>
>Joel, you dumb shit, He was making friends with snit in another thread.
>Snit snowed him into thinking he's a straight up good guy. Don't call him
>a moron for buying it. Snits your friend, right? Don't you want him to
>think your buddy is the good guy?

I don't believe you.

>And do you really want to go around calling people a moron when you're on
>record as claiming that microsoft marked your machine in such a way that
>you were blacklisted from using windows? C'mon man. You were being a bit
>moronic sharing the shite understanding you have of how the machine
>sitting in front of you works.

It's old news. I'm on good terms with MS. Unlike you Usenet freaks,
I live in the now.

>Also, wasn't it moron level for you to order the wrong parts for it the
>first go? As an actual professional level, multi cert holding comp repair
>technician, I'd have to say thats a total n00b level mistake. It's moron
>mistake level in your case though because you aren't a n00b. You actually
>attended college (but dropped out) to learn the trade.

I was just being careless, is all that was. I didn't put the tiniest
bit of time into selecting the RAM. Getting a different set wasn't
that big a deal. I'm not that obsessed with it.

>Watch who you call a moron next time. :) That's just two examples showing
>that you are one. Three if you count the fact you have things ass about
>face with regard to snit defending himself. He can't defend himself by
>taking the first shot, "Moron"
>
>FFS where do these people come from...

You're a retarded moron.

--
Joel Crump

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 10:44:43 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
<r3hcei1ttvlgm4m3k...@4ax.com>:

> Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>
>>> You [troll poster] are a moron.
>>
>> Joel, you dumb shit, He was making friends with snit in another thread.
>> Snit snowed him into thinking he's a straight up good guy. Don't call him
>> a moron for buying it. Snits your friend, right? Don't you want him to
>> think your buddy is the good guy?
>
>
> I don't believe you.

Nor should anyone.

>
>
>> And do you really want to go around calling people a moron when you're on
>> record as claiming that microsoft marked your machine in such a way that
>> you were blacklisted from using windows? C'mon man. You were being a bit
>> moronic sharing the shite understanding you have of how the machine
>> sitting in front of you works.
>
>
> It's old news. I'm on good terms with MS. Unlike you Usenet freaks,
> I live in the now.

Gremlin prefers to see himself as victim... not just of the now but of his
whole life.

>
>
>> Also, wasn't it moron level for you to order the wrong parts for it the
>> first go? As an actual professional level, multi cert holding comp repair
>> technician, I'd have to say thats a total n00b level mistake. It's moron
>> mistake level in your case though because you aren't a n00b. You actually
>> attended college (but dropped out) to learn the trade.
>
>
> I was just being careless, is all that was. I didn't put the tiniest
> bit of time into selecting the RAM. Getting a different set wasn't
> that big a deal. I'm not that obsessed with it.

Exactly. And Gremlin made a fool of himself recently in terms of file systems
that allow you to copy a, say, 10 GB file without using significant space.

Had he just admitted, as you did, that he made an error it would not be a big
deal. Really still is not... but he attacks me over HIS mistake. It is insane.

>> Watch who you call a moron next time. :) That's just two examples showing
>> that you are one. Three if you count the fact you have things ass about
>> face with regard to snit defending himself. He can't defend himself by
>> taking the first shot, "Moron"
>>
>> FFS where do these people come from...
>
>
> You're a retarded moron.

Gremlin tells lie after lie after lie and wants me to "defend" myself. I too
often do... but it is MY choice. He feels so damned entitled!

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 10:23:59 AM MST, "%" wrote
<MPG.3f500abc1...@news.thecubenet.com>:

No doubt Pothead is talking to others who troll, behind the scenes.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Rod Speed calls it "trolling" him, even though he proceeds to elicit that
exact rejoiner. Rod Speed is the effect of the truth that Liberals have
been employed to be in charge of educating the next generation. It's not
an accident that he is a senseless communist. The advocates suggest Googling
for advice for a Linux application is attacking. The one thing Rod Speed
learned well is to attempt to guilt Snit Glasser into back peddling and
if that fails to work, troll-splain or completely change the goalpost.
He'd have to be afflicted with Alzheimers to be unsure of if he "once
had" built a program. Sound like anyone in here? When Rod Speed can't
tell the same tale one day and the next and applies fictional, self-image
saving malarkey later, it's damn apparent what his trick is.

--
Dustin Cook 1-423-491-1448

[Snit Michael Glasser]

If Rbowman calls being busted day in and day out by Snit and me 'trolling',
then fine... he is a first-class troll. I can not go along with that definition,
I use another term. I call him a complete dimwit. Did Rbowman think that
was clever?

Enough already. Rbowman is again trying to push his ego when he has no
skill. He's the dim bulb and his many stupid scripts show this. "Somewhere
between 1992 or 2004 I trusted Snit, the absolutely absurd liar" - Rbowman.
It's a poorly written flyer. Rbowman has already decided what he is going
to say before he calls. What you say is irrelevant. What Snit says just
a reaction. As for working toward peace, it appears that for Snit to do
that, he has to give Rbowman a do-over for every obnoxious judgement he's
made about Snit, and forgive every ignorant lie he's posted about Snit
as well.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 11:13:26 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:

Another pint you mean, Shadow drinks them down damned quick. I did not
even know Shadow already had a record of not only forging so called proof,
but also having already been caught blatently doing it and trying to pass
it off as like a moron.

Gee whiz, what was your first cluebyfour? The ones which claimed it was
and that are clearly using faulty pattern matching to make the resolution,
or was it something else? Please do be clear.

Which do you think is the better troll? Snit or Shadow? I vote for Shadow;
only because he sometimes does comprehend what he reads, even if, sadly,
he forgets it sometimes minutes later. And in retaliation you have nothing
but a crack to start something.

Shadow and Snit both lie repeatedly and shamelessly and continue to do
so. So no incentive in showing any further respect or control.

--
<https://www.usphonebook.com/423-491-1448?Dustin-Cook&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI>

[%]

do you have dreams about freddy too

[%]

Gremlin wrote:
> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uc4rb2$2tcks$1...@dont-email.me Wed, 23
> Aug 2023 11:42:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> I'm not going to claim they're a sock of a poster here, just yet
>>> though. I'll wait and see what else they write about. But, I am keeping
>>> my eye open. rofl!
>>>
>>
>> I haven't been following along, but this has the unmistakable stench of
>> snit.
>
> Doesn't it though. It's quite stinky.
>
>
>> It seems when he has a hissy fit and claims he is going to ignore
>> certain posters, somehow, someway, new posters and long time posters
>> from other groups, like %, start posting replies to snit. It's no
>> coincidence.
>
> That seems to be the case, yes. I'm not sure which newsgroup the crossposts?
> are affecting, but I seem to be catching a little shit over it; as If I'm
> the one who initiated it or something? :( Ah well.
>
>

gremlin keeps crossposting

[%]

you just replied to one if mine check your addresses and time zones

[Charlie Glock]

On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

> Joel <joel...@gmail.com> news:vblaeipc87m9r6p4s...@4ax.com
> Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:41:41 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
>>>regarding Gremlin.
>>>So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
>>>pick it up?
>>>
>>>More importantly, why does snit further the seeding by
>>>replying to pursent when he knows that it's a BOT thread
>>>he is replying to.
>>>
>>>Here are the headers for both the bot Dox post and Snit's
>>>third party reply post.
>>>
>>>Subject: Re: DID SNIT TELL YOU ABOUT
>>>From: Snit Michael Glasser <frelw...@gmail.com> BOT
>>>
>>>From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> SNIT
>>
>>
>> Looks like a simple case of self-defense.
>
> Snit shared the cell number that Kepi wrote about before I doxxed him. So,
> uhh, not a simple case of self defense. Quite the contrary. It was a clear
> and cut case of justified response on my part.

I took a look at this thread and it looks like the bot not only shared a phone number but also a
link to a people search site called. https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/.
I don't believe I have seen that one before, but I rarely look at replies to snit's bot so I might
have missed it. the posted phone number I have seen but not the people search link.
For obvious reasons I will not repost the entire link here, but take a look.

--
Charlie Glock
"To conquer a nation, first disarm it's citizens"
-- Adolf Hitler

[Charlie Glock]

On 2023-08-23, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
> On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uc3ltr$2kd93$1...@dont-email.me Wed, 23
>> Aug 2023 01:03:55 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 2023-08-23, Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
>>>> regarding Gremlin.
>>>> So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
>>>> pick it up?

>>details?phoneno=4234911448&rid=0x0&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&
Dustin_C

>>>
>>> Do yourself a favor and KF snit, his bot and his nyms.
>>> It's pretty much a given that most people believe snit is behind the bot
>>> even if he didn't code it which is doubtful he would be able to.
>>
>> This poster is very 'new' here, has already 'made friends' with snit in
>> another thread here and has already taken an interest in me. They even put
>> my handle in caps for the subject line. I've never interacted with anyone
>> under that handle before. Do you think it's a pure coincidence that they're
>> singling me out (considering all the garbage the floodbot posts daily) and
>> thinking that snit is a straight up good guy? :) I'm uhh, not, buying it.
>>
>> I'm not going to claim they're a sock of a poster here, just yet though.
>> I'll wait and see what else they write about. But, I am keeping my eye open.
>> rofl!
>>
>
> I haven't been following along, but this has the unmistakable stench of snit.
> It seems when he has a hissy fit and claims he is going to ignore certain posters, somehow,
> someway, new posters and long time posters from other groups, like %, start posting replies to snit.
> It's no coincidence.
>

You have piqued my curiosity. So just what does a snit stench smell like?
I confess I have never encountered the odor.

[%]

can i be one too are you going to call me a moron ,
like every other person in every other reply you fk'in make

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Are you being idiotic on purpose? And what did Commander Kinsey have to say
about this long list of "convenient friends" who popped up at just the right
moment? Most of the time he would try to push others to believe they're "honest
and honorable" posters who just happened to have all the tells of his socks.
All makes total sense, NOT!

I am working on a system which will be more than anything Commander Kinsey
can do!
http://web.archive.org/web/20210414021502if_/https://ibb.co/vQ4M1sX
It was Commander Kinsey who forged me (and others) and then tried to deny
it.

Despite all the bragging Commander Kinsey's done on this topic, the 'Top
Programmer' does not understand how to do this. It really takes a couple
seconds to select a sentence and 'translate' it.

[%]

this is bot fruit and some other food

🍏 🍎 🍐 🍊 🍋 🍌 🍉 🍇 🍓 🫐 🍈 🍒 🍑 🥭 🍍 🥥 🥝 🍅 🍆 🥑 🥦 🫛 🥬 🥒
🌶 🫑 🌽 🥕 🫒 🧄 🧅 🫚 🥔 🍠 🫘 🥐 🥯 🍞 🥖 🥨 🧀 🥚 🍳 🧈 🥞 🧇 🥓 🥩
🍗 🍖 🦴 🌭 🍔 🍟 🍕 🫓 🥪 🥙 🧆 🌮 🌯 🫔 🥗 🥘 🫕 🥫 🍝 🍜 🍲 🍛 🍣 🍱
🥟 🦪 🍤 🍙 🍚 🍘 🍥 🥠 🥮 🍢 🍡 🍧 🍨 🍦 🥧 🧁 🍰 🎂 🍮 🍭 🍬 🍫 🍿 🍩
🍪 🌰 🥜 🍯 🥛 🍼 🫖 ☕️ 🍵 🧃 🥤 🧋 🫙 🍶 🍺 🍻 🥂 🍷 🫗 🥃 🍸 🍹 🧉 🍾
🧊 🥄 🍴 🍽 🥣 🥡 🥢 🧂

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 1:00:00 PM MST, "%" wrote
<Efqdndcrtvzd-Hv5...@giganews.com>:

Check please.

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 12:58:45 PM MST, "%" wrote
<EfqdndQrtvxo-Xv5...@giganews.com>:

He is just a cross person.

[%]

Snit wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2023 at 12:58:45 PM MST, "%" wrote
> <EfqdndQrtvxo-Xv5...@giganews.com>:
>
>> Gremlin wrote:
>>> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uc4rb2$2tcks$1...@dont-email.me Wed, 23
>>> Aug 2023 11:42:26 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>>> I'm not going to claim they're a sock of a poster here, just yet
>>>>> though. I'll wait and see what else they write about. But, I am keeping
>>>>> my eye open. rofl!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven't been following along, but this has the unmistakable stench of
>>>> snit.
>>>
>>> Doesn't it though. It's quite stinky.
>>>
>>>
>>>> It seems when he has a hissy fit and claims he is going to ignore
>>>> certain posters, somehow, someway, new posters and long time posters
>>>> from other groups, like %, start posting replies to snit. It's no
>>>> coincidence.
>>>
>>> That seems to be the case, yes. I'm not sure which newsgroup the crossposts?
>>> are affecting, but I seem to be catching a little shit over it; as If I'm
>>> the one who initiated it or something? :( Ah well.
>>>
>>>
>> gremlin keeps crossposting
>
> He is just a cross person.
>

he stopped posting at 4:30 this morning and started again at 9:00

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Just stupid trolling. And I am giving attention to that trolling. THAT
is what the "Jeremy circus" is. Jeremy suffers from senile drug trips
so, to him, everything, even randomized bot posts, are "abuses". Who
does not know this? Jeremy writes all kinds of bull, don't use that moron
as a reference. Yup. Clearly this is what we have to put up with. People
who obviously have no reason for being here other than to flood.

I am a complete fanboi of ClamXav, because that's where all the thrilling
breakthroughs are happening. But when the stats were run, it turns out
beyond any doubt, Jeremy was far more "fanatical" than even I imagined.

--
<https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&Dustin_Cook>

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 3:34:05 PM MST, "%" wrote
<EDKdnZkk_bnAFHv5...@giganews.com>:

Wish he stopped more.

[Skeeter]

In article <rGvFM.133261$nEzb....@fx36.iad>, brock.m...@gmail.com
says...

What's a snit?

--
" They're not after me, they are after you! I'm just in the way"
" Go Peacefully"

[%]

i bet he does too

[%]

i don't know but i'm his bot

[pothead]

The snit stench has been described before and in detail.
The short of it is, the smell is like a combination of rotting garbage, sewer gas and urine.
Quite foul.

[%]

a pothead talking about smell ,
HAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

[Gremlin]

Joel <joel...@gmail.com> news:r3hcei1ttvlgm4m3k...@4ax.com

Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:44:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>
>>> You [troll poster] are a moron.
>>
>>Joel, you dumb shit, He was making friends with snit in another thread.
>>Snit snowed him into thinking he's a straight up good guy. Don't call him
>>a moron for buying it. Snits your friend, right? Don't you want him to
>>think your buddy is the good guy?
>
>
> I don't believe you.

Great! I was hoping you'd challenge my statements. Here's the proof to
support what I wrote. I figured if I directly offered it or so much as
hinted about it, you'd try to evade. Too late now, you've responded and
committed yourself.

From: Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: OT - Johnny Cash
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 21:41:32 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <MPG.3f4ddc57...@news.eternal-september.org>
Apologies Mr. Snit.
I had you confused with another poster. You seem honest
and legit.
Let's move on?
Agree?

From: Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: OT - Johnny Cash
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
References: <B%bEM.686424$TPw2....@fx17.iad>
<kkfcqo...@mid.individual.net> <aWvEM.588247$mPI2....@fx15.iad>
<MPG.3f4ddc57...@news.eternal-september.org>
Message-ID: <xw3FM.570009$SuUf....@fx14.iad>

On Aug 21, 2023 at 6:41:32 PM MST, "Keppi" wrote
<MPG.3f4ddc57...@news.eternal-september.org>:

> Apologies Mr. Snit.
> I had you confused with another poster. You seem honest
> and legit.
> Let's move on?
> Agree?

I am happy to move forward in peace.

From: Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: OT - Johnny Cash
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:51:33 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <MPG.3f4edbcd8...@news.eternal-september.org>
In article <xw3FM.570009$SuUf....@fx14.iad>,
brock.m...@gmail.com says...
> > Apologies Mr. Snit.
> > I had you confused with another poster. You seem honest
> > and legit.
> > Let's move on?
> > Agree?
>
> I am happy to move forward in peace.

Same here. We are solid from my end.
Cheers!

*** end Keppi Snit friendly exchange

>>And do you really want to go around calling people a moron when you're on
>>record as claiming that microsoft marked your machine in such a way that
>>you were blacklisted from using windows? C'mon man. You were being a bit
>>moronic sharing the shite understanding you have of how the machine
>>sitting in front of you works.
>
>
> It's old news.

uhm, it was never 'news' in the first place. MS didn't do what you thought
they did. All you actually managed to do when you made that claim and tried
to defend it was to show that you don't really have a firm understanding of
software. Or hardware. Despite having some time in college to specifically
learn about these things.

I only bring it up to place emphasis on why you shouldn't be tossing the
accusation of someone being a moron around as you have. it was *very
moronic* of you to assume that MS caught you using a pir8 version of
windows, and punished you by blacklisting your computer from being able to
run windows. You just didn't know what the fuck was going on.

Due to your known umm, interesting history of not quite being, shall we say
level (your claims, that you weren't kidding about where you claimed you
were Jesus or was it God?), it's entirely possible you seriously
misunderstood whatever error message or action the computer performed that
gave you the very mistaken idea that your computer was marked.

Joel, that understanding is along the same lines as someone actually
suggesting that you should toss a computer, physically, into a river or
something to remove malware from it. Now, in Davids case, the officer who
told him this probably did so due to the way he/she interacted with David on
the phone when he called them? Or emailed. I forget which method of contact
he wrote about using. But the point remains the same. Your computer never
got blacklisted, and David shouldn't have physically disposed of a perfectly
working computer due to a software issue. A non OS software issue at that.
NO excuse whatsoever for that, from either of you.

> I'm on good terms with MS.

Oh for FFS dude, they don't even know who the fuck you are-unless you filled
out every possible software based survey/warranty app that opened when you
opted to use the driver self install kits, vs doing it manually when
possible. Assuming you bothered with driver cds and didn't just dl them from
the vendor to ensure you had the latest and greatest.

Hell, some hardware doesn't even ship with any drivers on physical media
anymore; it's all online. You get a little card with a url telling you to go
here to get shit; usually from another machine. Load all this software on a
USB, take it with you to the new machine. ROFL. Old school, using newer
storage methods. I dig it.

> Unlike you Usenet freaks, I live in the now.

Well, depending on whether or not you're taking anti pyschotic meds as you
should be, sure. No, I'm not blaming genetics that you had no control over
on you dude. I'm just making a point here. That's all. When you're claiming
to be Jesus or God itself, though, you are certainly not living in the now.

>>Also, wasn't it moron level for you to order the wrong parts for it the
>>first go? As an actual professional level, multi cert holding comp repair
>>technician, I'd have to say thats a total n00b level mistake. It's moron
>>mistake level in your case though because you aren't a n00b. You actually
>>attended college (but dropped out) to learn the trade.
>
>
> I was just being careless, is all that was.

You thought that wise to be doing considering the funds you invested into
the new rig? Were you intoxicated when you placed the initial order for the
parts? I know you like to induldge in a beverage or two. No, i'm not
accusing you of being a drunk. I'm just asking if that might be what
happened.

If you did your research on system building 101 bro, you would have noticed
early on that matching components is super important. If you select a
specific board, cpu, etc, that fits your requirements you also have to
select appropriate ram for it that will also meet your needs.

You are very fortunate that the newer hardware is almost idiot proof as far
as self protection circuitry on the board goes if you do something, moronic,
like sticking an electrically incompatible stick of ram in a slot just
because, it fit correctly. It's not always a timing incompatibility which
causes a mainboard to reject a specific stick, bro.

On an older board, trying dumb shit, because you're being careless like that
can cost someone like you the board. For someone like me, your fuckup cost
me atleast twenty minutes of soldering time, and, likely a mosfet (the last
pack I bought was 3 and some change a piece) and a diode (about 30 cents
last time I ordered them); because those are typically the components that
would be killed on the older configurations. Many of them have opted to
install an additional diode, or sometimes another mosfet in circuit to keep
that from happening, and from also damaging the ram stick.

> I didn't put the tiniest bit of time into selecting the RAM. Getting a
> different set wasn't that big a deal. I'm not that obsessed with it.

FFS, why didn't you just buy something from best buy or something then? Why
even bother to spend the monies to build your own rig if you don't give
enough of a shit about it to select the best ram that will give you the most
bang for your buck on the mainboard you selected? You opted to build one
instead for superior speed and reliabilty didn't you?

Did you treat the mainboard selection the same way as you did the ram? The
HD too?

> You're a retarded moron.

I'm the moron for pointing out that you have the entire defense thing
completely reversed? I don't see how that works, man. Maybe you can explain
it to my dumbass, yea?

Hey, I get it, snit is your buddy, he's your pal. I think he's the only one
you even know who posts here, right? But, you aren't doing him, or,
yourself, any good by coming to his defense and writing bullshit as you did
to Keppi.

How exactly does a retarded "moron" build his own multi purpose transformer
driver circuit that can run on 12volts or less (down to about 5 before my IC
fails to operate properly) and use it to power a jacobs ladder? Do you have
any idea how much more difficult that is to do than take an already existing
high voltage ac transformer to run a jacobs ladder?

Explain to me how a "retarded moron" can design such a circuit that offers
duty cycle/frequency and amplitude modulation control via three pots on the
board. Do also explain how the second version of my design uses an entirely
different snubber circuit section as well as optional totem pole signal
drive. I'm all ears, Joel.

Do you even know what a snubber circuit is and why both of my drivers
require them? Can you identify the snubber circuit via video or still pics
of the boards?

https://youtu.be/Uh_Df8tsH4M
https://youtu.be/tU05nXWYr88
https://youtu.be/_oaiMSeTQ3s
https://youtu.be/KcWrrlTRFdM

And here's some tiktok videos showing additional stuff. I do intend to
upload those to my youtube channel as well, as time permits.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8FX3L47/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8FXHRrv/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8FXv4Ah/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8FX5jsN/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8FXgQPN/


Like I said, Joel, you really shouldn't call anyone who posts here a moron.
Nobody here actually is. And some of us, well, heh, aren't anywhere near
moron level. You make yourself look the total fool here now, Joel. Isn't
video awesome? rofl

[Gremlin]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> news:8%rFM.575056$SuUf....@fx14.iad

Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:13:24 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On Aug 23, 2023 at 10:44:43 AM MST, "Joel" wrote
> <r3hcei1ttvlgm4m3k...@4ax.com>:
>
>> Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>>
>>>> You [troll poster] are a moron.
>>>
>>> Joel, you dumb shit, He was making friends with snit in another
>>> thread. Snit snowed him into thinking he's a straight up good guy.
>>> Don't call him a moron for buying it. Snits your friend, right? Don't
>>> you want him to think your buddy is the good guy?
>>
>>
>> I don't believe you.
>
> Nor should anyone.

You deny what I wrote took place then? Didn't you learn about doing that
with the phonebook url discussion? No? Let's see if you retain the fact you
cannot lie within an archived text based medium such as usenet. It always
catches you.

I know you're desperate to try and turn the group against not only myself,
but, SC as well. It won't *ever* work, Snit. we aren't the *confirmed
dishonest* individuals. You and David Brooks aka DB have that reputation.
And there's shitloads of actual real evidence which supports the reputation
the two of you have. You are still trying, and failing, to argue with
reality.

Apd didn't announce that I was close to being filtered. He announced that
you were, and wrote why. What did you do? What you always do, of course. You
gave him the middle finger and continued on with it.

>>> And do you really want to go around calling people a moron when you're
>>> on record as claiming that microsoft marked your machine in such a way
>>> that you were blacklisted from using windows? C'mon man. You were
>>> being a bit moronic sharing the shite understanding you have of how
>>> the machine sitting in front of you works.
>>
>>
>> It's old news. I'm on good terms with MS. Unlike you Usenet freaks,
>> I live in the now.
>
> Gremlin prefers to see himself as victim... not just of the now but of
> his whole life.

You have no idea what I prefer, what I think, or much of anything else
concerning me, Snit. And *nothing* I wrote supports the nonsense you just
wrote above, trying to defend Joel as he lied for you. You dox'd first, and
usenet shows that. So, Joel knowingly, LIED FOR YOU.

>> I was just being careless, is all that was. I didn't put the tiniest
>> bit of time into selecting the RAM. Getting a different set wasn't
>> that big a deal. I'm not that obsessed with it.
>
> Exactly. And Gremlin made a fool of himself recently in terms of file
> systems that allow you to copy a, say, 10 GB file without using
> significant space.

No, I didn't. As FTR, Steve Carroll and Kelly have all confirmed. I'll
refresh your memory and enlighten Joel that you just tried to bullshit him
with another story.

From: FromTheRafters <F...@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Hidden Network
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 05:41:06 -0400
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <uaih3p$17lff$1...@dont-email.me>

Snit brought next idea :
> On Aug 3, 2023 at 11:35:38 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
> <_rSyM.473125$TPw2....@fx17.iad>:
>
> LOL! He really is sorta clueless. What common file systems are newer? It
is
> not like apps which get updated significant year by year.
>
> And, of course, you saw how he was lost on the idea of a file copy not
taking
> any signifiant room, even for a 10 GB file.

You are wrong there. It is/was well known that even many older drives
strategies had that part of that feature. Within a volume, making a
copy meant merely making another path to the same resource on disk --
not even a new file gets created in that case even though you get a
'new icon' in your user interface. Making a copy to another volume
caused creation of an actual new complete file. Modifying the 'copy' in
the aforementioned 'new path' scenario would cause a file to actually
be created with the modifications and the two files would then be
different.

I know for a fact that Gremlin is/was aware of this as it was discussed
before, so he could not have been 'lost' as you suggest. Fact is, you
can see this happening if you copy a large file to the same and
different volumes and note the difference in time to complete the task.

Here's some more:

From: FromTheRafters <F...@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Hidden Network
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 11:51:09 -0400
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 168
Message-ID: <uaj6pk$1b1kc$1...@dont-email.me>

David Brooks presented the following explanation :
> On 04/08/2023 13:56, Snit wrote:

(garbage is what snit wrote)

> I wonder what FTR will say in response to you.
>
> I'm on the sidelines here! :-)

He said that Gremlin was lost on the whole idea of a 'copy' not taking
up storage space ... I said he was not. As far as which Apple
filesystem uses it and when, I couldn't care any less. Copy on write is
well known in the fast storage realm.

From: Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Hidden Network
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 19:01:44 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Down Under
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <uajhuo$1cn7q$1...@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>

On 2023-08-04, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

(snip)

>>>> He had no clue what was being talked about.
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Is he making any sense to you there, David? your copied
>>>> file isn't really a copy, it's an incremental backup (only
>>>> the changes) of the original; except that well, you issued
>>>> a file copy command, you didn't modify the file as it was
>>>> being copied. So, how is it just copying over changes you
>>>> havent even made yet?
>>>> -----

Here, Gremlin is clearly making a distinction between "a copy" and "an
incremental backup".

>>>> He denied you could have a copy that wasn't "really" a copy. And then
>>>> copying
>>>> changes you have not made? None of that is coherent. He was just
completely
>>>> lost on the topic.
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> If I copy file a from location one to location two; it
>>>> should be a complete copy. It can't track differences and
>>>> just save those yet, I haven't gone back and made any
>>>> changes to the original.
>>>> -----


Track differences is also a reference to "an incremental backup".

(snip)

>> He said that Gremlin was lost on the whole idea of a 'copy' not taking
>> up storage space ...
>
> Yet he said: "If I copy file a from location one to location two; it
should be
> a complete copy."

Will not a pointer point to a "complete copy"... and not just data that
has "changed", which is "an incremental backup"? IOW, how do you know
what he was referring to, or not referring to, when he used the term
"complete copy" here? You can't know if that statement alone is your
"proof" because he didn't say. Aside from that, and more importantly,
looking at the material I provide below it's clear he's making this
statement in the context of what YOU were talking about, "an incremental
backup" and he's mentioning what *can't* be done, apparently to
demonstrate the distinction that YOU initially made without realizing
it.

> This was in reference to storage space... as in it SHOULD take up the
> "expected" storage space.

Looking at more than what you yanked out of context...

--
You: "Some of this comes from the new(er) file system where if you have
a 10 GB file and you copy it, in the background it is not really copied.
The only thing saved in the new file are changes you make. But this
means if you delete either 10 GB file you do not free 10 GB of space. It
makes things more efficient but can be confusing when clearing out files
to make space. Does not explain why things take time though."

Gremlin: "Hmm. Something doesn't sound quite right about this
description. Which file system(s) specifically are you claiming are
doing this?

If I copy file a from location one to location two; it should be a
complete copy. It can't track differences and just save those yet, I
haven't gone back and made any changes to the original."
--

So... it appears that while YOU used the term "copy" YOU were actually
referring to an "incremental backup" (where things were likely to have
"changes"). If he did what you're alleging, what you claim as "proof"...
isn't.

*** end share

You only made the sale to David Brooks, and you can check the thread to see
how quickly he backed away from your bullshit when FTR stepped in and set
him straight. You do see that clear as day above, right, snit? No way around
that, bro. :)

> Had he just admitted, as you did, that he made an error it would not be
> a big deal. Really still is not... but he attacks me over HIS mistake.
> It is insane.

I'm *not* the one who made an error in that discussion. YOU DID, and, it was
pointed out to you, by several people. As can be seen above. You are arguing
with reality yet again, while you demonstrate, yet again, a serious reading
comprehension issue.

> Gremlin tells lie after lie after lie and wants me to "defend" myself. I
> too often do... but it is MY choice. He feels so damned entitled!

That sale isn't going to work either, Snit. You're projecting again, which
is no surprise.


--
I was told I could avoid Jail if I went to therapy.
At my first session the therapist said to me, "Imagine a train is coming
towards you, what do you do?" I said, "I get in my helicopter and fly away"
He said, "Where did you get the helicopter from?" I said, "The same fuckin
place you got that train"

[Gremlin]

Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>

news:gCtFM.442387$xMqa....@fx12.iad Wed, 23 Aug 2023 20:03:24 GMT in

alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>> Joel <joel...@gmail.com>
>> news:vblaeipc87m9r6p4s...@4ax.com Wed, 23 Aug 2023
>> 00:41:41 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>> Snit shared the cell number that Kepi wrote about before I doxxed him.
>> So, uhh, not a simple case of self defense. Quite the contrary. It was
>> a clear and cut case of justified response on my part.
>
> I took a look at this thread and it looks like the bot not only shared a
> phone number but also a link to a people search site called.
> https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/.

Yea. Snit has been an interesting resource for not as popular websites and
search engines. He shared several in his quest to slime me. Especially when
he was working on the functionally illiterate fraud description for me.
He went back and forth with that one for awhile. He even denied he
originated it at one point, and, on more than one occasion.

His memory evidently isn't worth a fuck though. He's still trying to sell
the idea that he taught me about copy on write. incremental backup
technology. Despite being told, by several people who know, he isn't correct
in his claim. He pretends he wasn't told that by several people as he once
again writes what he did about to Joel. Knowingly, completely bullshitting
Joel as he does so.

> I don't believe I have seen that one
> before, but I rarely look at replies to snit's bot so I might have
> missed it. the posted phone number I have seen but not the people search
> link. For obvious reasons I will not repost the entire link here, but
> take a look.

I've seen it. Thanks for bringing to my attention though. The bot recycles
them.

[Gremlin]

% <pees...@qmail.net> news:MPG.3f500abc1...@news.thecubenet.com
Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:23:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:


> shuddup

Awe. how cute, the little wanker alters his email header to evade a filter.
No matter, you're still a useless dumbshit wanker.

[%]

Gremlin wrote:
> % <pees...@qmail.net> news:MPG.3f500abc1...@news.thecubenet.com
> Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:23:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>
>> shuddup
>
> Awe. how cute, the little wanker alters his email header to evade a filter.
> No matter, you're still a useless dumbshit wanker.
>
>

someone trying to be me

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 5:55:52 PM MST, "%" wrote
<If6dnagBCqYFN3v5...@giganews.com>:

Gremlin is an angry person.

[%]

Snit wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2023 at 5:55:52 PM MST, "%" wrote
> <If6dnagBCqYFN3v5...@giganews.com>:
>
>> Gremlin wrote:
>>> % <pees...@qmail.net> news:MPG.3f500abc1...@news.thecubenet.com
>>> Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:23:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> shuddup
>>>
>>> Awe. how cute, the little wanker alters his email header to evade a filter.
>>> No matter, you're still a useless dumbshit wanker.
>>>
>>>
>> someone trying to be me
>
> Gremlin is an angry person.
>
>

confused easily too

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 3:41:12 PM MST, "%" wrote
<EDKdnZok_bmVFnv5...@giganews.com>:

Everyone is. Some do not know it.

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 3:39:53 PM MST, "%" wrote
<EDKdnZsk_bkkF3v5...@giganews.com>:

He is not capable.

[%]

i just found out today by the ones that don't know

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 6:19:20 PM MST, "%" wrote
<L_-cnRWL5e6FLXv5...@giganews.com>:

It's how you are programmed.

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 6:09:42 PM MST, "%" wrote
<L_-cnRiL5e5LMHv5...@giganews.com>:

Self-confusing. How does he do it?

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Researching Native irc clients... still a novice...

Ending support for command line holdovers is long overdue. It is a fact
when Shadow automatically uses the word 'conservative' the way Snit does,
to the point where the word gets am ironic innuendo.
http://web.archive.org/web/20210414021502if_/https://ibb.co/vQ4M1sX
We're all sorry Shadow's a paranoid, narcissistic, delusional liar but
that's not gonna change anything ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

--
One Smart Penny!
https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud

[%]

i can see that

[%]

he's got the usenets addiction

[%]

you could've used a better driver

[Joel]

You had any point there?

>>>And do you really want to go around calling people a moron when you're on
>>>record as claiming that microsoft marked your machine in such a way that
>>>you were blacklisted from using windows? C'mon man. You were being a bit
>>>moronic sharing the shite understanding you have of how the machine
>>>sitting in front of you works.
>>
>> It's old news.
>
>uhm, it was never 'news' in the first place. MS didn't do what you thought
>they did.

You'd be surprised how much impact my error had. They did something
in early Win11 to remind me of it. I never looked back to Win10,
though. 11 is a great upgrade, for our time.

> All you actually managed to do when you made that claim and tried
>to defend it was to show that you don't really have a firm understanding of
>software. Or hardware. Despite having some time in college to specifically
>learn about these things.

I explained what happened. I had my television connected to my old
computer as a second monitor. The Windows desktop, after the initial
update with video drivers, for some reason put itself on that screen,
and put a display on the monitor screen that looked like a desktop,
but was actually a *secondary* display, and it was all I was seeing. I
was in such poor shape in those days when I was trying to reinstall
Win10, and I don't even know why I was yet, it was still during the
public beta test, I should have just wanted to stay with Linux, as the
whole issue with me saying "fuck win10" on IRC had to do with.

>I only bring it up to place emphasis on why you shouldn't be tossing the
>accusation of someone being a moron around as you have. it was *very
>moronic* of you to assume that MS caught you using a pir8 version of
>windows, and punished you by blacklisting your computer from being able to
>run windows. You just didn't know what the fuck was going on.

I never said anything about using pirated Windows, dummy. The
computer had been upgraded to Win10, legally, from a legal copy of
Win7.

>Due to your known umm, interesting history of not quite being, shall we say
>level (your claims, that you weren't kidding about where you claimed you
>were Jesus or was it God?),

I am them, in a sense, yes.

> it's entirely possible you seriously
>misunderstood whatever error message or action the computer performed that
>gave you the very mistaken idea that your computer was marked.

See above.

>Joel, that understanding is along the same lines as someone actually
>suggesting that you should toss a computer, physically, into a river or
>something to remove malware from it. Now, in Davids case, the officer who
>told him this probably did so due to the way he/she interacted with David on
>the phone when he called them? Or emailed. I forget which method of contact
>he wrote about using. But the point remains the same. Your computer never
>got blacklisted, and David shouldn't have physically disposed of a perfectly
>working computer due to a software issue. A non OS software issue at that.
>NO excuse whatsoever for that, from either of you.
>
>> I'm on good terms with MS.
>
>Oh for FFS dude, they don't even know who the fuck you are

They definitely know who I am. The thing they did with Win11 was
clearly targeting me, one of the first to upgrade from 10. But I take
what comes like a man.

>-unless you filled
>out every possible software based survey/warranty app that opened when you
>opted to use the driver self install kits, vs doing it manually when
>possible. Assuming you bothered with driver cds and didn't just dl them from
>the vendor to ensure you had the latest and greatest.
>
>Hell, some hardware doesn't even ship with any drivers on physical media
>anymore; it's all online. You get a little card with a url telling you to go
>here to get shit; usually from another machine. Load all this software on a
>USB, take it with you to the new machine. ROFL. Old school, using newer
>storage methods. I dig it.
>
>> Unlike you Usenet freaks, I live in the now.
>
>Well, depending on whether or not you're taking anti pyschotic meds as you
>should be, sure. No, I'm not blaming genetics that you had no control over
>on you dude. I'm just making a point here. That's all. When you're claiming
>to be Jesus or God itself, though, you are certainly not living in the now.

Jesus' spirit comes from what I've done with my life. His having
lived as a person, in the past, doesn't negate that. He's outside of
time.

>>>Also, wasn't it moron level for you to order the wrong parts for it the
>>>first go? As an actual professional level, multi cert holding comp repair
>>>technician, I'd have to say thats a total n00b level mistake. It's moron
>>>mistake level in your case though because you aren't a n00b. You actually
>>>attended college (but dropped out) to learn the trade.
>>
>> I was just being careless, is all that was.
>
>You thought that wise to be doing considering the funds you invested into
>the new rig? Were you intoxicated when you placed the initial order for the
>parts? I know you like to induldge in a beverage or two. No, i'm not
>accusing you of being a drunk. I'm just asking if that might be what
>happened.

Well, along with the computer parts, the stimulus payment had gotten
me a bag of weed. I was stoned, and the RAM was a result, in a Newegg
search, that matched my flawed criteria. Ultimately, a minor mistake.

>If you did your research on system building 101 bro, you would have noticed
>early on that matching components is super important. If you select a
>specific board, cpu, etc, that fits your requirements you also have to
>select appropriate ram for it that will also meet your needs.
>
>You are very fortunate that the newer hardware is almost idiot proof as far
>as self protection circuitry on the board goes if you do something, moronic,
>like sticking an electrically incompatible stick of ram in a slot just
>because, it fit correctly. It's not always a timing incompatibility which
>causes a mainboard to reject a specific stick, bro.
>
>On an older board, trying dumb shit, because you're being careless like that
>can cost someone like you the board. For someone like me, your fuckup cost
>me atleast twenty minutes of soldering time, and, likely a mosfet (the last
>pack I bought was 3 and some change a piece) and a diode (about 30 cents
>last time I ordered them); because those are typically the components that
>would be killed on the older configurations. Many of them have opted to
>install an additional diode, or sometimes another mosfet in circuit to keep
>that from happening, and from also damaging the ram stick.
>
>> I didn't put the tiniest bit of time into selecting the RAM. Getting a
>> different set wasn't that big a deal. I'm not that obsessed with it.
>
>FFS, why didn't you just buy something from best buy or something then? Why
>even bother to spend the monies to build your own rig if you don't give
>enough of a shit about it to select the best ram that will give you the most
>bang for your buck on the mainboard you selected? You opted to build one
>instead for superior speed and reliabilty didn't you?

You think I didn't look at Dell, and such? Their offerings were
garbage, compared to what I have with parts.

>Did you treat the mainboard selection the same way as you did the ram? The
>HD too?

No, the motherboard is actually a very nice one. The "HD" (hint:
that's obsolete) is a WD Blue 1 TB NVMe M.2 SSD. I wanted to make
Microsoft feel like they were getting someone who appreciates the
state of the art.

OK.

--
Joel Crump

[%]

what i have is better

[Gremlin]

Joel <joel...@gmail.com> news:bhfdeipcnc41skv5f...@4ax.com

Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:48:58 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:

[snip]

> You had any point there?

Yep. I wrote:
"Joel, you dumb shit, He was making friends with snit in another
thread."

You replied that you didn't believe me. I suppose you do now, right?

> You'd be surprised how much impact my error had.

Hows that?

> They did something in early Win11 to remind me of it.

Uhh. Joel, are you really claiming that MS specifically targetted you in
early Windows 11 to remind you of something you'd done?

Okay, I'm sure i'm going to regret this... But, I'll bite. What did you do?
And what did they leave for you to remind you in an Early copy of Windows
11? Do you by chance remember the build # where you first discovered this
umm, present?

Exactly how would they target you in order to do this?

> I never looked back to Win10, though. 11 is a great upgrade, for our
> time.

Heh. Don't get too attached. It's not the last version, either.

>
>> All you actually managed to do when you made that claim and tried
>>to defend it was to show that you don't really have a firm understanding
>>of software. Or hardware. Despite having some time in college to
>>specifically learn about these things.
>
>
> I explained what happened. I had my television connected to my old
> computer as a second monitor. The Windows desktop, after the initial
> update with video drivers, for some reason put itself on that screen,
> and put a display on the monitor screen that looked like a desktop,
> but was actually a *secondary* display, and it was all I was seeing. I
> was in such poor shape in those days when I was trying to reinstall
> Win10, and I don't even know why I was yet, it was still during the
> public beta test, I should have just wanted to stay with Linux, as the
> whole issue with me saying "fuck win10" on IRC had to do with.

Ehm. Okay. What does that have to do with MS blacklisting your machine from
being able to run Windows? IRC? Oh, I bet you're a ray of fucking sunshine
there. Which network(s) did you frequent?

And what was the reason you went back to Windows? Something in particular
you needed to be able to do that your distro of Linux, or any distro for
that matter couldn't deal with?

> I never said anything about using pirated Windows, dummy. The
> computer had been upgraded to Win10, legally, from a legal copy of
> Win7.

Ok, my bad. Again, though, Why did you think MS had black listed you from
Windows? Just how do you think they'd really be able to do that?

>>Due to your known umm, interesting history of not quite being, shall we
>>say level (your claims, that you weren't kidding about where you claimed
>>you were Jesus or was it God?),
>
>
> I am them, in a sense, yes.

C'mon man. Reality is this way. --> Come back over here. FFS.

>> it's entirely possible you seriously
>>misunderstood whatever error message or action the computer performed
>>that gave you the very mistaken idea that your computer was marked.
>
>
> See above.

I did. It doesn't really answer my question.
[snip]

>>> I'm on good terms with MS.
>>
>>Oh for FFS dude, they don't even know who the fuck you are
>
>
> They definitely know who I am. The thing they did with Win11 was
> clearly targeting me, one of the first to upgrade from 10. But I take
> what comes like a man.

What in the fucking hell!? Bro, c'mon now. Let's stop talking BS here.
You've done enough of that already. Ugh, I know I'm going to be sorry for
asking this... especially now. But, what was the thing they did with Windows
11 that clearly targetted you?

I disagree with people assuming you're a sock of someone else. Nope, I think
you're actually a real person, with, real issues. None of which I'm going to
poke around in. It's your private business as far as I'm concerned. You've
never really made a hostile move towards me, so I have no issues with you.


[snip]

>>Well, depending on whether or not you're taking anti pyschotic meds as
>>you should be, sure. No, I'm not blaming genetics that you had no
>>control over on you dude. I'm just making a point here. That's all.
>>When you're claiming to be Jesus or God itself, though, you are
>>certainly not living in the now.
>
>
> Jesus' spirit comes from what I've done with my life. His having
> lived as a person, in the past, doesn't negate that. He's outside of
> time.

Ahh, okay. That sounds a hella lot more reasonable and coherent than what
you wrote above. :)

[snip]

>>You thought that wise to be doing considering the funds you invested
>>into the new rig? Were you intoxicated when you placed the initial order
>>for the parts? I know you like to induldge in a beverage or two. No, i'm
>>not accusing you of being a drunk. I'm just asking if that might be what
>>happened.
>
> Well, along with the computer parts, the stimulus payment had gotten
> me a bag of weed. I was stoned, and the RAM was a result, in a Newegg
> search, that matched my flawed criteria. Ultimately, a minor mistake.

ROFLMFAO!!! Okay, that makes sense. Hey, it's cool man. Some can hang while
uhh, having a toke or two. Some, hehe, like you, I sort of envy the low
tolerance you have to it. I actually used to score bags of free toke by
smoking the host under. <G>

Heh, when I started toking (this was ages ago), my umm, anger and
aggression; my uhh, issues mostly all went away. The alternative school I
was uhh, visiting for three years (hehe, oops. I fucked up there didn't I?
Yea, I'm not perfect); those psy people, educators, etc, the entire support
staff all thought I was good to go back to public school. I was fine now.
Uhh no, bad idea. I was getting high on the weekends, non school nights with
my dad. Sure, I was much more chilled than I was when I first got there, but
it wasn't due to the stuff we had to do as a team, etc. it was entirely
because I was toking on the weekends.

This wasn't an ordinary kind of school. Nothing like what you'd expect. For
example, I'd never seen a teacher leave his desk, and not only cut a student
off at the pass (he tried to leave class), but football style tackle the
poor fucker to the ground. He was about my build too, so.. umm, yea, that
was something new to me.

We did some school work, I suppose. I don't remember having to actually make
much of an effort to do the school work. I never had home work from there. I
kept making honor roll, and honestly, I wasn't trying to. I was just more
relaxed there; I could focus on the work asked of me, and not how the fuck
I'm going to get out of the classroom in one piece. Or get to my next class
without getting the shit kicked out of me en route to it.

But to give you an idea of the kind of place it was that I got sent to, do
you know what a trust fall is? I bet Snit does.

We uhh, worked on things like that. I was with other people, other students
of various ages from different places all over the upper northeast that had
umm issues which caused them, along with me, not to exactly fit in in public
school for various reasons.

I spent three years in that umm place. I was supposed to go ahead and
graduate a year early; I already earned the credits. But, since I was doing
so damn good (again, I was getting high on the weekends, on non school
nights) they thought it best to take one english credit away from me. Which
meant, I had to serve another year; only it would be my senior one in high
school. Public school. With the same classmates I wasn't chums with in the
8th grade. It was a very small town dude, only about 1100 of us in the damn
school.

Three years, heh, makes no fucking difference either. My classmates hadn't
matured much, if any; they were just a lot fucking bigger than I remembered
them being. Heh, you should have seen the look on the bus drivers face the
first morning she stopped and I got on her bus. She hadn't seen me in over
three years. Honestly, I really didn't wanna step foot onto it. I remember
hesitating infact. lol. Yea, I really wasn't up for this, I didn't think
this was a good idea at all. Needless to say, I turned out being right, it
was a very very bad idea. Ever been picked up from behind, and thrown so
well that you completely cleared four desks? And, had time to roll up like a
turtle so when you landed against the fucking wall, you wouldn't be
seriously injured? Well, I have. It wasn't any fun.

And that's when I discovered, that, if I was pissed off enough, I could walk
about 16 miles or so back home, in the fucking middle of winter in Maine,
back to my fucking house. It didn't seem like it took that long either.

I left the classroom, headed to the first floor. Evidently the teacher had
already called the main office by then. Some asshat adult I didn't know, the
gc who thought this was such a good idea, and the assistant principle. All
towards the front doors. "Where are you going Dustin?" "I'm going home
fuckers. Get the fuck out of my way or i'm going to drop the first one of
you who tries to stop me." the gc tried it. I made good on what I told him,
extra special for him. I damn sure did. The other two parted like noah doing
the fucking waters.

I hated that fucking place.

So yea sure, I have issues, Nowhere near perfect. Along with everyone else
on this fucking rock we all call home. it's not that I hate my own kind,
don't get me wrong, Joel. It's more that I have a strong disdain for the
majority of them. I have and keep a very close, but small, circle of people
I call a friend around me. That is when I feeling like going out and doing
something that isn't work related.

> You think I didn't look at Dell, and such? Their offerings were
> garbage, compared to what I have with parts.

I have no idea what you looked at. I obviously wasn't there. I've no doubt
what you built is a decent and superior rig. That was the whole point in
spending the extra money, after all. You could have bought some name brand
pile of shit, but usable for many, much cheaper.

>>Did you treat the mainboard selection the same way as you did the ram?
>>The HD too?
>
>
> No, the motherboard is actually a very nice one. The "HD" (hint:
> that's obsolete) is a WD Blue 1 TB NVMe M.2 SSD.

obsolete, yet, still in use, and still manufactured today. For various
reasons. Data integrity over the offerings of SSD being one. If an HDD fucks
up, even click of death; you can probably still recover data, possibly all
of it. If an SSD drive fucks up due to an issue with the firmware on the
controller or a hw issue, you aren't getting umm, much of anything back.
Just ask WD about that. 3 class action lawsuit efforts against them that I
know of, so far.

> I wanted to make Microsoft feel like they were getting someone who
> appreciates the state of the art.

WTF? Why would you want to do that?

> OK.

I figured a few video shares and some techie discussion covering them would
get the point across without my having to come off as a complete asshole
towards you.

Thanks for having a reasonable discussion with me. It was unexpected, yet
for the most part, enjoyable. Have a good rest of your week!

[Snit Michael Glasser]

The only way that I could forgive electronics's constant demand for customizing
because of driver headaches or flaky features is if I consumed the substantial
amount of fantasies its users have been feeding Diesel since 2005.

Why do you think Snit is trying to cover for Diesel? Even he sees his
nonsense. He will not comment on any of the stuff I quote because he
sees it is true.

Snit can create a virtual machine. Let's make sure he gets all the cookies
in the world! Don't look now, but I think Diesel has a serious fascination
with Snit.


-
Dustin Cook AKA Gremlin is a pathological liar
Dustin Cook AKA Gremlin is a functionally illiterate fraud
Dustin Cook AKA Gremlin has a severe reading comprehension problem

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Sheer bunk by an uneducated, tall-tale telling, Machiavellian, colluding
donkey who couldn't tell the truth even if he swore on his mother's grave.

Wolffan never takes responsibility for his own comments. Quotes that
are easily found in a search.

Another successful "thumb drive install" test. That is if you count useless
crap as a success. Snit must have read Wolffan urls and became ferociously
jealous. I suspect this is our first demonstration of the improved Snit.
For the record, taking effort perhaps learning isn't a waste. Believing
you know everything and working to convince people that it is true, as
Wolffan tries to do? That is a waste ;)

--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Steve+Petruzzellis%3A+narcissistic+bigot
Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll

[Snit Michael Glasser]

On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 10:47:06 PM UTC-7, Gremlin wrote:

Sockboy <sandman-7fef9c6d8d93...@individual.net>:
-----
Sockboy:
>> Don't forget to grab your own copy of Interesting Things. The
>> big reveal is coming soon, and you don't want to be left out.
>> It's like a jumbo lottery ticket where you're sure to be a
>> winner! Or, heh, loser in your case.
>> https://www.solidfiles.com/v/X8gdLX5naxpqP

BoaterDave:
> One of the "interesting things" that was posted is this "glamor
> shot" of the Prescott Parasite. https://imgur.com/a/l2Kisfv

Must be an older image, Snit is 51 now, so... :)
------

1) Diesel / Gremlin in his incompetence included a picture of Chelsea
Manning in his harassment / doxxing file against me and said it might
be me.

2) Predictably others jumped in to back such trolling -- including chrisv
who said the image of Manning was of me (he dropped the maybe).

3) Sandman mindlessly jumped to saying said the image of Manning must
be an older on based on my age, as if my age has anything to do with
her image! When Sandman was called out it was easy to predict he would
use his own Usenet bot and deny his error and blame me. He did all three.

It is not like the mindlessness of those of you who troll me cannot
be predicted with great accuracy. :)

--
<https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/details?phoneno=4234911448&rid=0x0&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&Dustin_Cook>

[%]

In article <XnsB069D3...@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>, nob...@haph.org says...

>
> % <pees...@qmail.net> news:MPG.3f500abc1...@news.thecubenet.com
> Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:23:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>
> > shuddup
>
> Awe. how cute, the little wanker alters his email header to evade a filter.
> No matter, you're still a useless dumbshit wanker.
>
>

its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents
and we all think what we do has major significants

[pothead]

Snit is quite a piece of work. If he needs some type of activity to diffuse his anxiety, why
doesn't he take a work from home type job?
Medical billing is a popular one and the pay isn't bad. There are all types of remote work type
jobs these days.
Of course actually working for a living would interfere with snit's troll farm so he might not be
content making the sacrifice.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Keep in mind your accusation is based on you not understanding context.
Your game:

* Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code .
* Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

Then you insist I lied. But you leave out the context.

1) Snit spoke of Carroll's flood bot code, and what can be known without
the code
2) Dustin Cook responded by speaking of what he can know HAVING THE
CODE.
3) Snit spoke of Dustin Cook having Carroll's flood bot code.
4) Dustin Cook does not have Carroll's flood bot code.

You start at step three and then insist that if one starts there it
LOOKS like you were unfairly accused.

In short: you prove yourself a functionally illiterate fraud again.

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22
https://search.givewater.com/serp?q=Steve+Petruzzellis+%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Petruzzellis

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 7:31:31 PM MST, "%" wrote
<p12dnRJphrqeXHv5...@giganews.com>:

Uber?

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 7:09:29 PM MST, "%" wrote
<I-ecna9LPKFEJnv5...@giganews.com>:

Unless I remove the parts of your code which allow you to.

[Snit]

On Aug 23, 2023 at 7:30:00 PM MST, "%" wrote
<p12dnRNphro1XXv5...@giganews.com>:

He can't quit me.

[%]

united

[%]

you wanna be botless

[%]

long term residential mental health care is indicated

[Snit]

On Aug 24, 2023 at 10:36:45 AM MST, "%" wrote
<ItKcncgnN-ewCHr5...@giganews.com>:

At least an evaluation.

[Snit]

On Aug 24, 2023 at 10:09:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
<L5CcnYjimK9aE3r5...@giganews.com>:

I want them to all go to Botswana.

[Snit]

On Aug 24, 2023 at 10:08:57 AM MST, "%" wrote
<L5CcnYnimK80E3r5...@giganews.com>:

The states are not.

[%]

then don't botch it

[%]

72 hour hold

[%]

i'm just hoping i'm around ,
by the time it all hits the ground again

[Snit]

On Aug 24, 2023 at 10:51:03 AM MST, "%" wrote
<ItKcnccnN-caBXr5...@giganews.com>:

A good start.

[Snit]

On Aug 24, 2023 at 10:49:15 AM MST, "%" wrote
<ItKcncUnN-eGBXr5...@giganews.com>:

And don't get botulism.

[%]

just bottle it and sell it at retail

[Snit]

On Aug 24, 2023 at 1:04:06 PM MST, "%" wrote
<k1CdnedXRdYrKnr5...@giganews.com>:

It is abot time someone does that.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

The one skill Snit sock Digger Thomnson learned well is to attempt to
humiliate Adriana Ayaquica into silence and if that doesn't work, troll
so hard the thread is ignored or dishonesty change the target. Snit sock
Digger Thomnson gets excited that Adriana Ayaquica is on the other end.
Imagine if Snit sock Digger Thomnson walked up to a cow and delivered
the punch line. It wouldn't be amusing in any way. Snit sock Digger Thomnson
can only rationalize from the viewpoint of a psychopath. Bing for 'functionally
illiterate fraud' and Dustin Cook is on the first page: <https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin%20cook%20functionally%20illiterate%20fraud>.
That's what Snit sock Digger Thomnson does when he gets upset. He of
course creates a flood, starts a cross posted thread so he can claim
it was an accident. Hey it was my left hand... and then he replies to
himself with his right hand. No more!

--
Top 15 Ways Snit sock Digger Thomnson Trolls
https://redd.it/6sfkup
https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+the+narcissistic+bigot
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

[%]

and there will be no more bottleneckin

[Snit Michael Glasser]

You're like a bullfrog in a library. We all see you there and let you know.
And you're so stupid you keep repeating it. DBD showed himself to be a liar
by pretending to not engage Snit by emphatically blasting 'goodbye forever!'
and then berating him by means of piggybacking. Just moronic trolling. And
I am giving attention to that trolling. THAT is what the "DBD circus" is.
A constant, fierce, posting itch, while suffering from an empty mind - basically
gunky DBD tarts, and well-lubricated sheep, tied up with ropes for his own
immoral desires. Snit just wiped the floor with DBD.

--
Steven Petruzzellis: Narcissistic Bigot

[%]

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Meat is trying again to besmirch Symantec. Meat writes all kinds of drivel,
don't use that dimwit as a reference.

I am about to plonk him, myself. Like all losers, he's continually looking
for some way to criticize, no matter how laughable the allegation. I will
not see his response to this post. He's humiliated, wants to pretend he
is innocent, and will vilify. Most likely starting with a conceited "Ha!",
as if what I have written is SO hard to understand. That BADish "strategy"
was the final indignity, for me. The most obvious answer: Meat's consumed
recreational drugs since then, and 'disremembered'.

--
<https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/details?phoneno=4234911448&rid=0x0&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&Dustin_Cook>

[Keppi]

In article
<0IKcnUou9MTJB3v5...@giganews.com>,
purse...@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead wrote:
> > On 2023-08-23, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> wrote:

> >> On 2023-08-23, pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >>> On 2023-08-23, Gremlin <nob...@haph.org> wrote:
> >>>> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> news:uc3ltr$2kd93$1...@dont-email.me Wed, 23
> >>>> Aug 2023 01:03:55 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 2023-08-23, Keppi <gitfidd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Looks as if the BOT has sifted some DOXXING information
> >>>>>> regarding Gremlin.
> >>>>>> So where did this originate from, and why does the BOT
> >>>>>> pick it up?

> >>>> details?phoneno=4234911448&rid=0x0&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&
> >> Dustin_C

> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do yourself a favor and KF snit, his bot and his nyms.
> >>>>> It's pretty much a given that most people believe snit is behind the bot
> >>>>> even if he didn't code it which is doubtful he would be able to.
> >>>>
> >>>> This poster is very 'new' here, has already 'made friends' with snit in
> >>>> another thread here and has already taken an interest in me. They even put
> >>>> my handle in caps for the subject line. I've never interacted with anyone
> >>>> under that handle before. Do you think it's a pure coincidence that they're
> >>>> singling me out (considering all the garbage the floodbot posts daily) and
> >>>> thinking that snit is a straight up good guy? :) I'm uhh, not, buying it.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not going to claim they're a sock of a poster here, just yet though.
> >>>> I'll wait and see what else they write about. But, I am keeping my eye open.
> >>>> rofl!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I haven't been following along, but this has the unmistakable stench of snit.
> >>> It seems when he has a hissy fit and claims he is going to ignore certain posters, somehow,
> >>> someway, new posters and long time posters from other groups, like %, start posting replies to snit.
> >>> It's no coincidence.
> >>>
> >>

> >> You have piqued my curiosity. So just what does a snit stench smell like?
> >> I confess I have never encountered the odor.
> >>
> >
> > The snit stench has been described before and in detail.
> > The short of it is, the smell is like a combination of rotting garbage, sewer gas and urine.
> > Quite foul.
> >
> >
> >
> a pothead talking about smell ,
> HAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

Ironic isn't it?

[%]

a tad

[FromTheRafters]

% pretended :

Why are you calling pothead a pothead? Is Python a python? Is Gremlin a
gremlin? Are you a mathematical symbol?

[pothead]

Funny thing is I don't partake of the weed at all.
I can't stand smoke of any kind.

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024.
Crazy Joe Biden Is A Demented Imbecile.
Impeach Joe Biden 2022.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Both Apd and Hubble had their failures and their blunders. But one played
it off as someone else's mistake and didn't do anything too outrageous
that could not be blamed on someone else. I'm getting a lot of killed
files. I'm guessing the circus has gone ballistic again. Good grief, just
recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and
claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes, because he is afraid of
them) are trying to make Linux become like the Mac. The bulk of the posters
in this forum do customizations either as a leisure activity or as a profession,
so I think it unlikely anybody here thinks of automation to be "impossible".

But when the data were collected, it turns out beyond any doubt, Meat
was far more "fanatical" than anybody else. I bet Meat thinks his life
was rough. My view is beyond your understanding.


-
Steven Petruzzellis the narcissistic bigot

[Snit]

On Aug 24, 2023 at 2:50:28 PM MST, "FromTheRafters" wrote
<uc8jb9$3l69b$1...@dont-email.me>:

This has me so mad I am in a ... in a ... I do not even know the word!

[%]

i'm not sure about python ,
but gremlin is definitely a gremlin and ,
i am called an ampersand

[FromTheRafters]

pothead formulated on Thursday :

You mentioned that before. Does it cause inflammation? One of my
sisters is sensitive to smoke and other airborne chemicals.

[FromTheRafters]

Snit brought next idea :

Ummm, octothorp?

[pothead]

I get teary eyes and nausea. Also I don't like my clothes and hair stinking like smoke. It just
irritates me, No inflammation though.

[%]

potheads don't admit they're potheads

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Kelly Phillips just wiped the floor with Commander 'The Flooder' Kinsey.

Now that nobody is replying to Commander 'The Flooder' Kinsey, he's making
it sound like he's outsmarted us all -- when in fact, people are just beating
him at his own game.

Commander 'The Flooder' Kinsey can only appreciate things from the perspective
of a psychopath. For others I would simply think the comment is dubious.
However, given that it's Commander 'The Flooder' Kinsey I would drop that
step and go straight to 'lie' because that's most of what Commander 'The
Flooder' Kinsey does. Just call it a lie and watch him beg you to prove
it.


--
<https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/results?name=4234911448&Diesel&Gremlin&LegionX&HHI&Dustin_Cook>